As mentioned in the previous post, I was losing my effing mind when I got to California a week or so ago, had been on I-10 for so long that I could barely remember a part of my life that didn't involve the freeway, and so on. Part of the solution was to put on the title track from Sufjan Stevens' Illinois record, which is like a pleasure button for me, especially while driving. Diminishing returns never seem to kick in.
My brother-in-law and I were recently discussing Sufjan and we found ourselves sadly in agreement that we may not see great work from him again. All recent indications suggest that he has kind of lost it. Strange as it seems, I was always optimistic about his quixotic and ostensibly stupid 50 States project--not that he would finish it, but just that any state record he came up with was going to be a great purchase, and that at least 4 of its 172 tracks would be solid gold. He's shown no recent signs of wanting to continue on this path, and rather than cheering him for moving in no directions, I sigh. I had really hoped to one day, as an old retired snowbird, be the lone voice among my friends at the bridge table advocating the Delaware album as his true magnum opus. But alas.
At any rate, it seems a good time to suggest a few of the strengths that make the good music in his output so astoundingly good. I've not the energy to be exhaustive, but here are a couple things that spring to mind.
1) SS is a brilliant instrumental colorist.
His fast songs especially are often a buzzing counterpoint of different sounds that I sometimes feel I can literally see. Examples: in the Illinois title track, the transition from winds in the first part to strings in the second part. The insistent guitar lick throughout the second half. The transitional section in between (talk about layers). The placement of the vibes. Listen to "Casimir Pulaski Day" again and hear those high held notes in the organ later on, something I missed the first dozen times I heard the song. Or how about the lamentlike falling 1/2 step figure in the brass in "For the Widows in Paradise."
I'll come back to color more generally in a second, but first
2) SS is a really fantastic writer of ballads.
Michigan is frankly a bummer, which I didn't like at first. I wanted a record full of tracks like "Detroit" so I could drive around with it on and feel good all the time. But listen to these ballads, their carefully chosen images and anecdotes, the space: is there anyone else who can convey such emotional subtlety along with a vulnerability that is sometimes actually uncomfortable to listen to? ("I am crying in the bathroom" in CPD, &c.) Or something more restrained, like "The Upper Peninsula": "I live in America with a pair of Payless shoes." There's a nuanced character introduction for you.
3, and this is why I really wanted to write this post)
Am I the first to compare Sufjan Stevens with Thomas Hart Benton? If so, I call it. Benton's images sprung to mind as I was listening that day. Examples:


I see a certain affinity in the colors, in the way everything is bent in or out for emphasis, in the way these figures are drawn, exaggerated, mythicized.
Regionalism, eh? Hm. Peter Garland has called for a return to it. I'm always, in words at least, extolling local music scenes and cursing homogenization, so I suppose I'm about it as well. But that's not really what Michigan and Illinois are about. These are detached perspectives, postcards from someone who is not from the places. The style is the same in both cases, it's only the content, the specific people and stories, that change.
So we come to the fork in the road. Is regionalism a style in which an artist creates affectionate portraits of various places, or is regionalism a method in which an artist, steeped in a place, creates a unique style that rises organically from it? The former is easier. Anyone can take a generic camera and drive around and take pictures. It's when the camera actually changes that we learn something new.



