28 June 2009

Misc.

Some interesting thoughts related to Michael Jackson: Trevor Hunter at Newmusicbox, Mark Richardson at Pitchfork.

Also on Newmusicbox is a preview of The Listen, a new book by composer and fellow IWU alum and Peter Gilbert and Christopher Jon Honett. Looks like an interesting project, I'm looking forward to reading more.

On another totally unrelated note, I thought for no reason yesterday about the "Tips for Beginners" FAQ on the Austin Symphony's website, which is a really cute, easily mocked, but also kind of well done classical concert primer. My favorite question: "Why don't the musicians smile when they play?" It also includes some good classical music links. I would, however, be happy if no one ever used the word "Maestro" in seriousness ever again. Yuck.

26 June 2009

Summertime

Grand Lake has a summer Thursday night live music series: each week, some goofy little folk group of some sort is set up in the gazebo when I arrive for call. They're constantly playing to tiny and passive audiences of around ten to twenty people, including the two guys who are selling popcorn. The effort is made yet more quixotic by the mercurial mountain weather, which has delivered rain every Thursday thus far--and not all day, mind you, just in time for the music. The first week it was in the forties out there and the few spectators were under blankets; last week the rain was insignificant enough that most of the audience was in lawn chairs. Tonight, though, was seriously wet, and only a small coterie was present, popcorn in hand, protected under the awnings of the library.

I don't know where they find these bands, but each one of them suggests a wealth of stories that I'd really like to hear--or at least that's what I think at first, before I become irritated by their music/stage banter/both and go inside. The first week it was a Christian family band from Nebraska, complete with a battery of golden-haired, mandolin-playing youngsters; tonight it was a trio of guitar, piano and drums playing "Summertime" and "Proud Mary" in the chilly mist. The primary singer in these bands is never who you expect, in fact is generally the last person on the stage you think to look at.

I'll admit it, though, my heart grows three sizes when I see these groups out there week after week. God knows where they come from or who's continued to encourage their pursuits. I wonder if all of their audiences are as vaguely disinterested as the ones here. I myself rarely tolerate much more than a song and a half, but I'm still just so glad to see those people out there. Because playing music, learning to physically play an instrument and then want to play it in front of people, rain and apathy be damned, is a weird, irrational thing to do, but there are times when weird irrationality is vital, and this happens to be a manifestation of it that I particularly believe in.

I'm thinking of the Peter Garland quotation I put on here a year ago May, describing continued human expression, in the face of the horrors of the twentieth century, as "heroic." The twentieth century, with its mass war-induced recognition of human brutality, is over. For Americans, at least, that awareness and introspection has cooled and hardened into ironic detachment--into a steady state of impassivity where pursuits, generally speaking, are often considered frivolous if not entirely futile.

There's not a damn reason to play music. It'll never be as polished as a studio recording, and you'll never be as good as the ten thousand other people who already play that instrument. And besides, there's already muzak coming over the speakers in here, don't you hear? If you start playing, someone's going to have to walk over and turn it down. All the more reason to keep playing. Just picking up an instrument is becoming an act of defiance. So pick the thing up, right now, and take it outside. Like Ed Abbey said: "Don't drop it on your foot--throw it at something big and glassy. What do you have to lose?"

22 June 2009

Internet radio renewed my faith in new music

You mean you can just listen to the stuff, and take it in, and enjoy it, without reading pompous bios/program notes, enduring (or participating in) absurd posturing, or getting embroiled in endless debates about its "quality"/relevance to society/theoretical and historical implications?  Revelatory.


Other recommendations welcome!

16 June 2009

Keeping up

I don't follow a whole lot of blogs. There are only a handful I read regularly, and a bunch more that I look at only occasionally. NPR's jazz site A Blog Supreme has recently jumped into the former category. It's easy to lampoon the weblog practice, but sites like ABS are so useful for keeping in touch with a certain scene or thread within music.

12 June 2009

People who show up

I've been checking out Dave Hickey's essay collection Air Guitar. He's an art critic who also does and writes about music, hence the title, although it's a bit misleading--air guitar is his derogatory analogy for the act of writing criticism. It's been teaching me a great deal of new vocabulary words, which is great, but also the book is worth its price only for "Romancing the Looky-Loos," which is an essay that I feel like nailing to a bunch of doors. It's about the difference between spectators and participants, those who just happen across the concert versus those who are truly engaged. Spectators, or "civilians," were "people who did not live the life--people with no real passion for what was going on. They were just looking." (148)

Listen to this. "The butterfly effects of cultural eccentricity are of no interest to spectators; they either consume, or they critique...Beyond this hegemony of corporate and institutional consensus, however, beyond the purview of uncannily lifelike blockbusters like Jurassic Park and the Whitney Biennial, everything that grows in the domain of culture, that acquires constituencies and enters the realm of public esteem, does so through the accumulation of participatory investment by people who show up." (150)

The most enthralling thing about this book has been Hickey's conception of cultural levels--there is the controlling class, which consists, interestingly, of both academia and the corporate tastemakers, and then there is this vast underbelly of actual people at actual bars making actual art/music/whatever and actually talking about it. Art coming into existence through real-life, quotidian socialization. Hickey entered this level by dropping out of graduate school and opening an art gallery (in Austin, of course), and the ideas he's developed through the experience of dealing with art from commercial, academic, and critical vantages are deep and always surprising. Each essay begins with something and then goes somewhere different and more insightful than you expect it to. He also really knows how to write.